WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] GPLPV network performance

To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] GPLPV network performance
From: Grant McWilliams <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:41:53 -0800
Cc: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:42:36 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Kt8XGyPiztBBa1YxNyHVv8W5E5rWNN6Jl9rmH9+Srzg=; b=RSK4qngPpSh9Oly6d8AvMpgiK1A6+p+MDtZ5PBiSsWm/6gbCE1oy3jcFug8Xt9kMnz xGL9A4TbaOykxN72jcpHfNEa1NhxNEGr0w7Jv4v1NBNm8pS/9vBWWsSHnt2uq3tD0/Yy r9KZgAUd6aObmcmnOFqg8QSOiIJKStJIVt+kg=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=onJU9EBcCQ5/f5hNLPwJKS22eXxhUQSin6i8PgM/S546ZF12bFWrjvsQOkkpDxlYVa 7vg8eRACR2FXuVIAaq2dQ8PY//UHlrRmBn9pR1LpzXWQ/0fnJUcnBrtBUhazSskIH+Qv Xxheouhbtg2k2CQp3+7aKBmpqMdxO0ttRROCo=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <49757A4F.9020601@xxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <alpine.LRH.0.9999.0901171121470.20983@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4973E895.7060403@xxxxxxxxx> <49740F17.4040805@xxxxxxxxx> <ed123fa30901182255h30f19455kf92aed5e408d7e8b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49744773.50304@xxxxxxxxx> <C1EAC9C5E752D24C968FF091D446D8232DF32F@ALTERNATEREALIT> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01550418@trantor> <ed123fa30901192050m3620d6e5wb851c3bde8dc5f50@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01550434@trantor> <49757A4F.9020601@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Let's see. Using HW of the same spec, domU <-> domU (same dom0):
- Windows 2003 : 530 Mbps (this is the previous result)
- RHEL 5.2 (PV) : 2.7 Gbps
I don't have a pair of Linux HVM domUs with PV drivers to check.

I'd say there's a lot of room for improvement :)

Regards,

Fajar

_


I'm not sure where you've gotten those numbers from but I'm curious why I don't. I have two companies using Xen on CentOS 5.2 with CentOS 5.2 DomUs and I'm getting the same numbers on both. DomU to Dom0 (or anywhere outside) is as fast as the hardware. DomU to DomU runs about 450-500Mbits/sec. It's consistant so far. If I could get 2.7 Gbps I'd be happy as a clam but I haven't seen it.


Grant McWilliams

Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use Windows."
Now they have two problems.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users