On Sun, 2008-01-27 at 15:05 +0100, Sami Dalouche wrote:
> On the one side, it seems that Xen, when used on top of a raid array,
> is
> wayyy slower, but when used on top a plain old disk, seems to be
> pretty
> much native performance. Is there a potential link between Xen and
> RAID
> vs non raid performance ? Or maybe the problem is caused by Xen + RAID
> +
> LVM ?
Unless we're talking software raid here, I don't see the connection.
I'm still concerned about memory sizes here -- you're running the
benchmark with different write sizes based on your differing memory
sizes. Can we shore that up? Limit your dom0 to 512MB of memory and
create a domU with 512 MB memory. Create a RAID device and LVM it if
you want, then mount it in dom0, run `bonnie++ -u root -r 512`, then
umount and export it to domU, mount it there, and run the same
benchmark. (Note that in neither case is the device the root
filesystem.)
With bonnie++, dd, etc., I've always seen near-native performance
between dom0 and domU.
John
--
John Madden
Sr. UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana
jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Home