Re: [Xen-users] how to manage bridge externally

[Daniele Palumbo <daniele@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Monday 29 January 2007 17:53, Daniele Palumbo wrote:
> i did something like that (forget about syntax error, i didn't made "cut
> and paste", but this is what i did):
[...]

to be clear, that is the exact sequence:
xen2 ~ # ifconfig eth1 up
xen2 ~ # vconfig add eth1  14
Added VLAN with VID == 14 to IF -:eth1:-
xen2 ~ # vconfig add eth1  600
Added VLAN with VID == 600 to IF -:eth1:-
xen2 ~ # ifconfig eth1.14 up
xen2 ~ # ifconfig eth1.600 up
xen2 ~ # brctl addbr xenbr1
xen2 ~ # brctl addbr xenbr1.14
xen2 ~ # brctl addbr xenbr1.600
xen2 ~ # brctl addif xenbr1 eth1
xen2 ~ # brctl addif xenbr1.14 eth1.14
xen2 ~ # brctl addif xenbr1.600 eth1.600
xen2 ~ # brctl setfd xenbr1 0
xen2 ~ # brctl setfd xenbr1.14 0
xen2 ~ # brctl setfd xenbr1.600 0
xen2 ~ # brctl sethello xenbr1 0
xen2 ~ # brctl sethello xenbr1.14 0
xen2 ~ # brctl sethello xenbr1.600 0
xen2 ~ # ifconfig xenbr1 up -arp -multicast
xen2 ~ # ifconfig xenbr1.14 up
xen2 ~ # ifconfig xenbr1.600 up
xen2 ~ # /usr/sbin/ethtool -K eth1 tx off
xen2 ~ #

> then i pass both xenbr1 and xenbr1.600 to domu.
>
> xenbr1.600 is working correctly, xenbr1 no.
> and i can't see packet passing through xenbr1 in dom0.
> both vif1.0 and vif1.1 is correctly attached to the bridge, and eth1 and
> eth1.600 too.

another hint: seems that only untagged traffic goes to the bridge...
i know, this is maybe bridge-utils related, but with xen script (as posted 
before) it works!

i can't see real difference with xen script, what is going on?

bye
d.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users