| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Xen with HA
|
To: |
tim.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-users] Xen with HA |
|
From: |
Otavio Salvador <otavio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:33:52 -0200 |
|
Cc: |
msinhore@xxxxxxxxx, Marco Sinhoreli <marco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Carlos Dória <cdoria@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Carlos Rocha <crocha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, miuato@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 08 Jan 2007 08:34:45 -0800 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<1168270081.15109.225.camel@tower> (Tim Post's message of "Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:28:01 +0800") |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
Organization: |
O.S. Systems Ltda. |
|
References: |
<45A252BD.90801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1168270081.15109.225.camel@tower> |
|
Sender: |
xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) (i486-pc-linux-gnu) |
Tim Post <tim.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> Consider that, where the block device is primary, the VM is active on
>> the host, and where the device blocks is secondary, the VM is inactive
>> on this host.
>
> You may find this is easier utilizing network attached (centralized)
> storage in lieu of block level mirroring, however your explanation is
> somewhat confusing.
Like use a Storage you even a Cluster FS like GFS or OFS2?
>> We wish information from the list if this solution have been done by
>> someone,in positive case, if there is some documentation that
>> contemplate this implementation ,and in negative case, how to do an
>> implementation of a HA integrated with Xen.
>
> Your solution should work exactly as you described it, if I'm
> understanding it correctly. My only recommendation is to ditch block
> level mirroring and go with centralized storage.
Yes. But if you're not going to use a clusterfs you'll end using a
Storage solution that is, indeed, the better option but also more
expensive. Am I wrong Tim?
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: otavio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home