| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Xen + Windows + Intel VT-x stability
noniko wrote:
> Hi, everyone
>
>> For HVM, I'd recommend 10.2.alpha4.
>
> Yes, I completely agree! I'm looking forward to 10.2 being released.
> So I would need no more to write a complicated hvm file...
>
> By the way, I made some report on "Is virtualized Windows really
> usable in practice?" topic.
>
> http://cropcrusher.web.infoseek.co.jp/shufuden/winxen/index.html
>
> I did not uploaded this report directly (making a link, though) on
> openSUSE wiki because it's not so directly related to SUSE itself.
>
> The above document itself was created using Openoffice.org 2.0 on
> Windows VM. I spent 3 hours for it but most of times were killed with
> thinking up English sentence, not by performance problems of Windows VM.
>
>
Thank you very much for sharing your nice report. I will of course
suggest it on my Linux forum.
Terje J. Hanssen
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home