WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Domain 0 allocation is too small for kernel image

To: "McCaskey, Todd" <todd.mccaskey@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Domain 0 allocation is too small for kernel image
From: Daniel Nelson <packetcollision@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 01:11:43 -0400
Cc: Ted Kaczmarek <tedkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 05:09:15 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cXCEQslKVQE+/ac3nTGCfU0x4dpM+cGlGXgm00ct4tDCdl9pukG0udYEFWmZqX9qrLT95KYdSNbLOMWJKgcxiPlzycJVJKu6W0arKuot+k+2vjST8OdXOOB/UUN3OF4sP4k8zdiCnBEL3et+g5DMWzIyuRIX9LnOjp1ALO3rj1Q=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <84EA05E2CA77634C82730353CBE3A843035BD5EA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <84EA05E2CA77634C82730353CBE3A843035BD5EA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Daniel Nelson <packetcollision@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I don't personally know anything about this problem, but from what
I've read on the list it seems like it could be an issue with an
initrd.  Try looking through the list archives for FC4 and initrd

-Daniel Nelson

On 10/6/05, McCaskey, Todd <todd.mccaskey@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Paul/Ted
>
> I also appended that too to the kernel bootparam line and the results
> were the same.
>
> We are using an internal platform (single proc/single core 939 (FX))
> based on the VIA K8T800Pro chipset.
>
> -Todd
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ted
> Kaczmarek
> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 3:23 PM
> To: McCaskey, Todd
> Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Domain 0 allocation is too small for kernel
> image
>
> On Thu, 2005-10-06 at 15:07 -0500, McCaskey, Todd wrote:
> > Domain 0 allocation is too small for kernel image
> >
> >
> >
> > That's the error message I get after installing FC4 and following the
> > instructions on
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraXenQuickstart
> >
> >
> >
> > running kernel - 2.6.13.1.  I partitioned Fedora to have 6GB on a 30GB
> > drive.
> >
> >
> >
> > I have tried adjusting dom0_mem=256M on a system that has 1GB of RAM
> > and still no luck
> try dom0_mem=256000
> >
> >
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> Shouldn't matter but never hurts to try.
> >
> >
> >
> > -Todd
> >
>
> What mobo you going to test with, with recent hg snaps
> I have made trying to bring up SMP guests has been an adventure.
>
> I am testing with tyan 2462 SMP.
>
> Regards,
> Ted
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>


--
"If the English language made any sense, lackadaisical would have
something to do with a shortage of flowers." --Doug Larson

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users