xen-ia64-devel
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d638
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:56:44AM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote:
> Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 11:16:02AM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote:
> >> Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:54:13AM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote:
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>> There is no new regression found in Cset#18580. Three old
> >>>> issues still existed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Old issue (3):
> >>>> 1. Qemu will disappear and VTI hangs when we do 'xm restore'
> >>>> and 'xm migrate'
> >>>
> >>> Hi. Does this still exist?
> >>> The change set 18578:ba543f51c6f1 should fix this.
> >>> At least works for me with xm save/restore. I haven't tried xm
> >>> migrate, though.
> >>>
> >>> Does qemu-dm exit with the following message?
> >>> from xen_vga_vram_map() in hw/vga.c
> >>> fprintf(stderr, "Failed to map vram nr_pfn=0x%lx
> >>> vram_addr=%llx: %s\n", nr_pfn, (unsigned long
> >>> long)vram_addr, strerror(errno)); exit(1);
> >>>
> >>
> >> Yes, my qemu-dm log shows: Failed to map vram nr_pfn=0x200
> >> vram_addr=c0000000: Invalid argument
> >> I used GFW#129, image type is QCOW. Since it works for you, what is
> >> the difference between us? Thanks. :)
> >
> > Ah, I'm using patched GFW. I sent out two patches as
> >
> > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-ia64-devel/2008-09/msg00067.html
> > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-ia64-devel/2008-09/msg00068.html
> >
> > But I guess Tristan is too busy to commit those.
> > The patch in msg00067.html would fix the issue. Could you try that
> > patch?
>
> Thanks, I see.
> GFW building needs too much to set up the compile environment. So, I am
> afraid it may need some time for me to check it.
> Anyway, I will mark the old issue1 as a GFW issue first. Hope Tristan can
> check it in soon. :)
Yeah, it takes a while to setup the environment.
I put the binary I'm using at
http://people.valinux.co.jp/~yamahata/xen-ia64/gfw/20081006/FV_RECOVERY.bin-20080925
This binary is the latest change set + the above two patches.
thanks,
>
>
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> >>
> >>> thanks,
> >>>
> >>>> 2. With 4096M, VTI can not boot up emulated rtl8139
> >>>> network-card
> >>>> 3. With 4095M, qemu of VTI guest will disappear when booting
> >>>>
>
> Thanks,
> Zhang Jingke
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
>
--
yamahata
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue,
Isaku Yamahata <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Tristan Gingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, KUWAMURA Shin'ya
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, KUWAMURA Shin'ya
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, KUWAMURA Shin'ya
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
|
Previous by Date: |
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke |
Next by Date: |
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke |
Previous by Thread: |
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke |
Next by Thread: |
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|