xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d638
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:54:13AM +0800, Zhang, Jingke wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> There is no new regression found in Cset#18580. Three old issues
>> still existed.
>>
>> Old issue (3):
>> 1. Qemu will disappear and VTI hangs when we do 'xm restore' and
>> 'xm migrate'
>
> Hi. Does this still exist?
> The change set 18578:ba543f51c6f1 should fix this.
> At least works for me with xm save/restore. I haven't tried xm
> migrate, though.
>
> Does qemu-dm exit with the following message?
> from xen_vga_vram_map() in hw/vga.c
> fprintf(stderr, "Failed to map vram nr_pfn=0x%lx
> vram_addr=%llx: %s\n", nr_pfn, (unsigned long
> long)vram_addr, strerror(errno)); exit(1);
>
Yes, my qemu-dm log shows: Failed to map vram nr_pfn=0x200 vram_addr=c0000000:
Invalid argument
I used GFW#129, image type is QCOW. Since it works for you, what is the
difference between us? Thanks. :)
> thanks,
>
>> 2. With 4096M, VTI can not boot up emulated rtl8139 network-card
>> 3. With 4095M, qemu of VTI guest will disappear when booting
>>
>> Detail Xen/IA64 Unstable Cset #18580 Status Report
>> ============================================================
>> Test Result Summary:
>> # total case: 17
>> # passed case: 14
>> # failed case: 3
>> ============================================================
>> Testing Environment:
>> platform: Tiger4
>> xen ia64 unstable tree: 18580
>> dom0 Cset: 687
>> ioemu commit: 0f3d6384d1b3d96476f78950b14040f9c1c63375
>> processor: Itanium 2 Processor
>> logic Processors number: 8 (2 processors with Dual Core)
>> pal version: 9.68 service os: RHEL5u2 IA64 SMP with 2 VCPUs
>> vti guest os: RHEL5u2 & RHEL4u3
>> xenU guest os: RHEL4u4
>> xen schedule: credit
>> gfw: open guest firmware Cset#126
>> ============================================================
>> Detailed Test Results:
>>
>> Passed case Summary Description
>> Two_UP_VTI_Co UP_VTI (mem=256)
>> One_UP_VTI 1 UP_VTI (mem=256)
>> One_UP_XenU 1 UP_xenU(mem=256)
>> SMPVTI_LTP VTI (vcpus=4, mem=512) run
>> LTP SMPVTI_and_SMPXenU 1 VTI + 1 xenU (mem=256 vcpus=2)
>> Two_SMPXenU_Coexist 2 xenU (mem=256, vcpus=2)
>> SMPVTI_Network 1 VTI (mem=256,vcpu=2)
>> and'ping' SMPXenU_Network 1 XenU (vcpus=2) and 'ping'
>> One_SMP_XenU 1 SMP xenU (vcpus=2)
>> One_SMP_VTI 1 SMP VTI (vcpus=2)
>> SMPVTI_Kernel_Build VTI (vcpus=4) and do
>> KernelBuild UPVTI_Kernel_Build 1 UP VTI and do
>> kernel build SMPVTI_Windows SMPVTI
>> windows(vcpu=2) SMPWin_SMPVTI_SMPxenU SMPVTI Linux/Windows
>> & XenU
>>
>> Failed case
>> Save&Restore Save&Restore
>> VTI_Live-migration Linux VTI
>> live-migration One_SMPVTI_4096M 1 VTI
>> (vcpus=2, mem=4096M)
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Zhang Jingke
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
Thanks,
Zhang Jingke
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue,
Zhang, Jingke <=
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Tristan Gingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Zhang, Jingke
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, KUWAMURA Shin'ya
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata |
Next by Date: |
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata |
Next by Thread: |
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#18580, Linux#687, ioemu#0f3d6384... Status Report --- no new issue, Isaku Yamahata |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|