|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?
> > RHEL5.x will always support a PV dom0 and not require VT processors for
> > Xen.
>
> Absolutely. And as I mentioned, since RHEL5 supports both PV and HVM
> guests, we're pretty well committed to whatever ships in RHEL6 doing the
> same -- or at least providing an easy upgrade path, so that any and all
> guests created under RHEL5 will continue to be usable under RHEL6.
Presumably there's the option of creating a shim to shoehorn legacy guests
into an HVM container? Does IA64 use a hypercall transfer page?
Cheers,
Mark
--
Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/)
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, (continued)
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Juergen Gross
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Jarod Wilson
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Tristan Gingold
|
|
|
|
|