|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?
Alex Williamson wrote:
> I would expect
> RHEL5.x will always support a PV dom0 and not require VT processors for
> Xen.
Absolutely. And as I mentioned, since RHEL5 supports both PV and HVM guests,
we're pretty well committed to whatever ships in RHEL6 doing the same -- or at
least providing an easy upgrade path, so that any and all guests created under
RHEL5 will continue to be usable under RHEL6.
--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, (continued)
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Juergen Gross
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Alex Williamson
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?,
Jarod Wilson <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, tgingold
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Time for hybrid virtualization?, Tristan Gingold
|
|
|
|
|