 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-ia64-devel
[Xen-ia64-devel] Why metaphysical rid rr0 and rr4 ?
| To: | Xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-ia64-devel] Why metaphysical rid rr0 and rr4 ? |
| From: | Tristan Gingold <tgingold@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Sep 2007 03:45:03 +0200 |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 24 Sep 2007 18:39:44 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi, for metaphysical mode, we use two different alternate rids (one for rr0 and one for rr4). Because they use the same mapping why don't we use the same rid for both rr0 and rr4 ? This should avoid duplicate entries in the VHPT. Tristan. _______________________________________________ Xen-ia64-devel mailing list Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: PATCH[3/3] take 2: xenitp tool, Alex Williamson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Why metaphysical rid rr0 and rr4 ?, Isaku Yamahata |
| Previous by Thread: | SOLD OUT - LAST CHANCE- We selling branded watches like. Rolex. Patek Omega. Do you want one? yjpy7, Jeannette Gibson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Why metaphysical rid rr0 and rr4 ?, Isaku Yamahata |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
