|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false
Quoting "Zhang, Xing Z" <xing.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> >> I think both these methods work if we don't need to support other OS.
> >
> >That's the major issue. There are at least half a dozen of OS
> >for ia64 and
> >we are not sure this method won't break another OS.
> >
> >ACPI method is fine. If it could't work, I'd prefer explicit
> >flag in xm
> >configuration file.
> >
> >Tristan.
> >
> I think SMBios table is better than explicit field in configure file.
> It's convenient to user if we make configure file thiner.
> IMO, SMBios is not hard to implement. Actually I have finished the code
> in open GFW and Xen. I will debug it soon to make it run.
That's very good news!
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-ia64-devel] _OSI(Linux) == false, Alex Williamson
- [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, Alex Williamson
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, Alex Williamson
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, Zhang, Xing Z
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, tgingold
|
|
|
|
|