xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 10:47 +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
> >From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.williamson@xxxxxx]
> >
> > HP has HPUX, OpenVMS, and NonStop. There's also BS2000, the
> >mainframe OS Fujitsu-Siemens now has PV support for. From wikipedia, it
> >looks like Bull also supports another mainframe OS, GCOS, on ia64.
> >Probably a sampling of research OSes available as well.
>
> Hi Alex,
> Have you tried to run HPUX, OpenVMX and NonStop on top of VTI-domain?
No I haven't. Tristan has played a little bit with OVMS. My guess
is that none of them will work without some VTI domain support tweaking
and none of them will have support for any of the Qemu NICs. BTW, has
anyone thought about writing a Qemu device model for an Intel e1000 NIC?
Seems like it would be a good contribution since the current set of PC
class NICs aren't supported by some of the server class OSes. Thanks,
Alex
--
Alex Williamson HP Open Source & Linux Org.
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, tgingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, Zhang, Xing Z
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, Alex Williamson
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, tgingold
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, Alex Williamson
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false,
Alex Williamson <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, Zhang, Xing Z
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: _OSI(Linux) == false, tgingold
|
|
|