xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: ptc.ga implementation for SMP-g
>From: Xu,Anthony
>Sent: 2006年4月4日 23:36
>>> And as you said IPI may cause trouble when considering migration.
>>> If above method is feasible, I prefer this one.
>>How to be sure the time window is not too long ?
>>vcpu1 must waits for vcpu2.
>Sorry for not clear, IMO vcpu1 doesn't need to wait vcpu2.
>Vcpu1 also doesn't wait vcpu2 by using IPI, is here any issue?
First, I'm not sure the exact trouble for IPI with migration, which should be
same for all approaches if there.
Then, I think things may become more complex if vcpu1 doesn't wait for
other vcpus to complete the purge emulation. You need to consider race
conditions since multiple emulation requests may exist at same time if
previous ptc.ga emulation returns before completion.
Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: ptc.ga implementation for SMP-g, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: ptc.ga implementation for SMP-g, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: ptc.ga implementation for SMP-g, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: ptc.ga implementation for SMP-g, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: ptc.ga implementation for SMP-g, Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: ptc.ga implementation for SMP-g, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: ptc.ga implementation for SMP-g,
Tian, Kevin <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: ptc.ga implementation for SMP-g, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: ptc.ga implementation for SMP-g, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: ptc.ga implementation for SMP-g, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: ptc.ga implementation for SMP-g, Xu, Anthony
|
|
|