Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: Include a version of bsd's queue.h

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

David Vrabel writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: Include a version of bsd's 
queue.h"):
> On 25/10/11 18:35, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/libxl/bsd-queue.3
> > @@ -0,0 +1,1044 @@
> > +.\" Copyright (c) 1993
> > +.\"        The Regents of the University of California.  All rights 
> > reserved.
> > +.\"
> > +.\" Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> > +.\" modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> > +.\" are met:
> > +.\" 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> > +.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> > +.\" 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> > +.\"    notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
> > +.\"    documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
> > +.\" 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this 
> > software
> > +.\"    must display the following acknowledgement:
> 
> I think you'll have to drop the manpage because of this clause in the
> license.

Well spotted.  I checked the licence comment at the top of the actual
code but not the one in the manpage.

However I think this is actually fine if all we're doing is committing
it to our source tree, for convenience of reference.  We aren't
referring to "features or use" of the manpage.

But it warrants a paragraph in COPYING.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel