WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD

To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD
From: Lin-Bao Zhang <2004.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:24:33 +0800
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 03:25:31 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BbiDknAqnnoldPAqETGq/rN6+R05tW+BftXvSjRm8NQ=; b=KcsX487/Pc7lIq0DmBbB8f/O0ucQyhTzn9Bf+vxhHMwzlWuE4dkWiy7vOkWXGyK8n8 j8qWMxhvtS/UBnb3HvEe/UJgsv9Zo1sqMipAs4QvKQaC5Bmv7wnAMaDMb4Gd+lO4AlyS D/VogHwvxi6piNgRBYkjHFg0hqgzuhxWFuZSw=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4E53694F.70008@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CANuKePmurLWCEEJVzbQv2hSzccUiE-NHDkuVddgyRyXapb9Znw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CA72B048.30827%keir@xxxxxxx> <4E53694F.70008@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
yes, redhat has adopted this modification:

1. Change BOOT_TRAMPOLINE to 0x7c000
 2. In xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S, change the line 'mov $0x98000,%esp' to 'mov
 $0x80000,%esp'.
we are testing various cases.

I will update our testing result ASAP.


2011/8/23 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 08/18/2011 01:04 PM, Keir Fraser wrote:
>>>
>>> >  0x95400 - 0x90000 = 0x5400 = 21KBytes.
>>> >
>>> >  21Kbytes is enough for gen.gz running(hypervisor) ?
>
> The trampoline is even smaller than 21K.  The problem is that the stack (at
> 0x98000) is overlapping the EBDA.
>
> I suggest that you open a support case with Red Hat.  We do plan to make
> this change, but the process is much easier if we have an open ticket that
> requests it.
>
> Paolo
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel