|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
AW: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer...
Through some adding of printk I was able at least to verify that for my
3 core CPU AMD Athlon X3 400e
- xen_px_notifier is called six times
- Hypervisor is reporting XEN_PM_PX is called six times
- Hypervisor is never reporting XEN_PM_CX to have been called
- this is because xen_cx_notifier is never called.
-> set_cx_pminfo is never called.
What I will try to find out next is to check where xen_cx_notifier
*should* be called. OS debugging is
not realy my expertise, let's see whether you first can give me a hint
or whether I am quicker to find
it on my own.
Carsten.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Tian, Kevin [mailto:kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. Juni 2011 06:19
An: Carsten Schiers; xen-devel
Betreff: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer...
> From: Carsten Schiers [mailto:carsten@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 12:05 PM
>
> > to verify BIOS problem, you could run a native Linux to verify.
>
> I can tell you that it worked with the old Xenified 2.6.18 kernel.
Then possibly some patches get lost in your current env...
>
> > This looks strange. At least C1 should be available. You may check
> Xen/dom0
> > log to see any error there, or manually add some printk in
> set_cx_pminfo to
> > see any error there.
>
> I check tonight. Does it make sense also to turn debug info on for
Dom0
> acpi?
>
You can have a try though I don't think that gives much hint because
basic ACPI logic doesn't change in Dom0. The more interesting thing is
about the gear logic between dom0 and Xen. Does the dom0 notify
Xen on earth? Is there some condition making Xen reject the call? ...
Thanks
Kevin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Tian, Kevin
- AW: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Carsten Schiers
- AW: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer...,
Carsten Schiers <=
- RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Tian, Kevin
- AW: RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Carsten Schiers
- RE: RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Tian, Kevin
- AW: RE: RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Carsten Schiers
- RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Tian, Kevin
Re: AW: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Ian Campbell
|
|
|
|
|