|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: AW: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer...
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 11:50 +0100, Carsten Schiers wrote:
> > The more interesting thing is
> > about the gear logic between dom0 and Xen. Does the dom0 notify
> > Xen on earth? Is there some condition making Xen reject the call? ...
>
> I am not sure whether this is a gear, but in dmesg I have a WARNING
> which is issued by enlighten.c/xen_apic_write, saying: Warn to see if there's
> any stray reference.
Those are 99% likely to be benign.
>
> > You may check Xen/dom0
> > log to see any error there, or manually add some printk in set_cx_pminfo to
> > see any error there.
>
> I'll do that tonight, Kernel is already baking...
>
> BR,
> Carsten.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Tian, Kevin
- AW: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Carsten Schiers
- AW: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Carsten Schiers
- RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Tian, Kevin
- AW: RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Carsten Schiers
- RE: RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Tian, Kevin
- AW: RE: RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Carsten Schiers
- RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Tian, Kevin
Re: AW: RE: [Xen-devel] No C-States any longer..., Ian Campbell
|
|
|
|
|