|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: Nested VMX patch series 00
To: |
"Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: Nested VMX patch series 00 |
From: |
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Jun 2011 09:47:34 +0100 |
Cc: |
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, "He, Qing" <qing.he@xxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:49:18 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<1A42CE6F5F474C41B63392A5F80372B2561480B3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Organization: |
Citrix Systems, Inc. |
References: |
<osstest-7468-mainreport@xxxxxxx> <1A42CE6F5F474C41B63392A5F80372B2561480B3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Please don't start new threads by reply to an old, unrelated mail -- it
confuses threading.
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 05:11 +0100, Dong, Eddie wrote:
> Keir/Tim:
> Here is the nested VMX support series for comments. The current
> solution works with host shadow page table. The virtual EPT support
> will come soon.
I'm neither Tim nor Keir but the documentary aspects of this series seem
rather insufficient IMHO, even for an RFC.
You summary lines are mostly verbose boilerplate with very little actual
information and the changelog entries do not generally describe the
change either. Lastly you haven't included a Signed-off-by on at least
some of the patches (maybe that's OK for an RFC but you did sign off
some of them).
Also there are two patch 5's and two patch 12's, a tool such as the hg
email extension would help avoid that sort of thing.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: Nested VMX patch series 00,
Ian Campbell <=
|
|
|
|
|