WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Merging xen/dom0/backend/blktap2 ..

On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 13:24 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 02:39:47AM -0800, Daniel Stodden wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 03:31 -0500, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 03:33 +0000, Daniel Stodden wrote:
> > > > is an overall pita and I've had the pleasure several times now.
> > > 
> > > Merging it into what? xen/stable-2.6.32.x or some newer upstream version
> > > based tree?
> > 
> > Newer upstream. Otherwise I wouldn't bother. It's certainly not a common
> > operation, I was just suprised how much garbage is involved.
> 
> There is another party that is interested in doing this too, so it might
> be a good idea to compare ideas. Let me ping them to see where they are.
> 
> But putting aside the blktap2 driver - what about that ugly #ifdef CONFIG_XEN
> piece of code that went in the generic code. Is that gone?

??

> I would think that the first path would be to post patches that introduce
> the required infrastructure. 

You mean for blktap? There isn't much infrastructure left, except a
popular zap_page_range export because it doesn't tear down VMAs, just
ptes, to complete requests.

I usually try not to not lose history, so just folding that branch (I
guess the drivers/block transition is an obvious start point) would not
be my preferred solution. But if people prefer that, that's certainly
easy to produce.

> For that thought you might want to wait when
> the merge window opens and Linus starts pulling Stefano's and my tree. At 
> that point
> a lot of the infrastructure backends should be in. Or if you like, you can
> take a merge of my #linux-next and Stefano's #linux-next and use that as a 
> base.
> 
> I've also up-ported blkback to 2.6.38 - look in devel/xen-blkback-v1 to
> see what I needed to do use the   override mechanism.

I found these commits all picked from your devel/next-2.6.38 tree, so
I'm presently still sticking to that. Yup, going  to check out the
override stuff too.

Thanks,
Daniel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel