WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] iommu=0 leading to panic when system defaults to using x2api

To: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] iommu=0 leading to panic when system defaults to using x2apic
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:12:21 +0000
Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 01:13:23 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Why wouldn't iommu=0 imply not using the x2apic, if use of the
iommu indeed is a prerequisite (which by itself seems questionable
as long as APIC IDs aren't wider than 8 bits)?

Looking further at enable_bsp_x2apic(), I also wonder whether
the pre-enabled case, when specifying iommu=0 and x2apic=0,
can actually work if iommu=0 is a prerequisite (intremap_enabled()
would return 1 in that case afaics, so the early check doesn't help).

Thanks, Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel