 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] bogus gfn - mfn - gfn - mfn checks in guest_physmap_add_
| To: | Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] bogus gfn - mfn - gfn - mfn checks in guest_physmap_add_entry |
| From: | Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 26 Nov 2010 08:27:10 +0100 |
| Cc: | Patrick Colp <pjcolp@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 25 Nov 2010 23:36:04 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1290756440; l=480; s=domk; d=aepfle.de; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Subject:Cc:To:From: Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=h43GOUo/GCX/EWNiRcw78g95oUs=; b=mk8sfarnM94caZzx/Eo13uOFZAlXiheitUA8d2Kz44B76SeUUnMi+kqCbiD8ZtKD2EO PsDa8BUN/Rk8XO1XF21HtastMMg2+KVCpC2gk0V12JM5qnnM5h85v5LYbQlJSwwz51/6T lwkRlJvRNlxojRod59aWpJWrQFJDqqZ+Pe4= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <C91493F3.B22B%keir@xxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <20101125205346.GA26720@xxxxxxxxx> <C91493F3.B22B%keir@xxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Thu, Nov 25, Keir Fraser wrote: > This patch is still RFC I assume? Quite apart from anything else, the patch > will need to be made against xen-unstable. At this point, given the need for > the waitqueue infrastructure to get xenpaging working reliably, I don't > think fixing xenpaging for stable 4.0.x upstream is going to fly. It's going > to be tough enough getting it stable for 4.1. Sure, I will finally port all these changes to xen-unstable, today. Olaf _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2 of 4] support topolgy info in xl info, Juergen Gross |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] Snapshot fail, when snapshot a vm the second time. (already update to xen-4.0.1 and kernel-2.6.32.25), huang . shuangqing |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] bogus gfn - mfn - gfn - mfn checks in guest_physmap_add_entry, Keir Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] bogus gfn - mfn - gfn - mfn checks in guest_physmap_add_entry, Olaf Hering |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
