|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] bogus gfn - mfn - gfn - mfn checks in guest_physmap_add_
On Wed, Nov 24, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, Tim Deegan wrote:
> > Another option would be to audit all callers of p2m_is_ram() and check
> > whether they can handle paged-out PFNs (which I though had already been
> > done but seems not to be). Keir's VCPU yield patch might be useful in
> > some of those places too.
>
> I think most if not all is caught by my changes already.
A quick grep shows there are a few places that need an audit wether or
not the paging types can be removed from p2m_is_ram().
Olaf
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|