|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in tools
On 11/16/2010 02:11 AM, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 16/11/2010 10:02, "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> The right answer is probably to refuse save/restore/migrate when devices are
>>> passed through.
>> Absolutely.
>>
>> However we are talking about setting up a 1-1 mapping in the P2M region
>> corresponding to the PCI hole at guest boot and preserving that until
>> such a time as a device is plugged in, which may be after a migration.
>>
>> I don't think it matters that no device is passed through at the time of
>> the migration, in this configuration we still need arrange for the
>> relevant P2M entries to be correct after the migration (or at least
>> before the device gets plugged in, perhaps we can leave holes and only
>> establish the 1-1 p2m on demand in pcifront?).
> Leave the hole empty and populate on demand when devices are passed through
> would seem sensible.
Actually I was originally thinking that the hole would all be
INVALID_MFN but then pfn_to_mfn() would translate that to being an
identity translation. But that's pretty hacky, and only works if you
actually want identity. On-demand population of regions is much cleaner.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm), (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm), Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm), Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm), Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm), Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm), Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm), Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm),
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm), Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm), Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm), Jeremy Fitzhardinge
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC Patch] Support for making an E820 PCI hole in toolstack (xl + xm), Gianni Tedesco
|
|
|
|
|