|   xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall	implementation 
| To: | Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> |  
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall	implementation |  
| From: | Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxx> |  
| Date: | Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:29:01 +0100 |  
| Cc: | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>,	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>,	kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zach.brown@xxxxxxxxxx,	Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx |  
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:52:52 -0700 |  
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |  
| In-reply-to: | <4AE7DC04.7080706@xxxxxxxxxx> |  
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |  
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |  
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |  
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |  
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |  
| References: | <4f079cd6-0872-4cb5-832b-ee6a46841192@default>	<4AE739DA.20601@xxxxxxxx> <4AE7DC04.7080706@xxxxxxxxxx> |  
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |  
| User-agent: | Jack Bauer |  
| On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 07:52:04AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/27/2009 08:20 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> On 10/27/09 10:29, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
>>    
>>> Is there any way for an application to conclusively determine
>>> programmatically if the "fast vsyscall" pvclock is functional
>>> vs the much much slower gettimeofday/clock_gettime equivalents?
>>>
>>> If not, might it be possible to implement some (sysfs?)
>>> way to determine this, that would also be backwards compatible
>>> to existing OS's that don't have pvclock+vsyscall supported?
>>>
>>>      
>> It would probably be simplest and most portable for the app to just
>> measure the performance of gettimeofday and see if it meets its needs.
>>    
>
> How can you reliably measure performance in a virtualized environment?
If we loop gettimeofday(), I would expect the vsyscall-based version not to show
up in strace, right?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add	vsyscall	implementation, (continued)
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add	vsyscall	implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add	vsyscall	implementation, Avi Kivity
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock:	add	vsyscall	implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock:	add	vsyscall	implementation, Avi Kivity
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock:	add	vsyscall	implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock:	add	vsyscall	implementation, Avi Kivity
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5]	x86/pvclock:	add	vsyscall	implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add	vsyscall	implementation, Dan Magenheimer
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock:	add	vsyscall	implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock:	add	vsyscall	implementation, Avi Kivity
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall	implementation,
Glauber Costa <=
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add	vsyscall	implementation, Avi Kivity
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add	vsyscall	implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add	vsyscall	implementation, Avi Kivity
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall	implementation, Chris Mason
RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall	implementation, Dan Magenheimer
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add	vsyscall	implementation, Avi Kivity
RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall	implementation, Dan Magenheimer
RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall	implementation, Dan Magenheimer
[Xen-devel] pvclock implementation in pv_ops kernel: why not	__native_read_tsc()?, Dan Magenheimer
[Xen-devel] Re: pvclock implementation in pv_ops kernel: why not	__native_read_tsc()?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 |  |  |