|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Share the IO_APIC_route_entry with iosapic
To: |
'Keir Fraser' <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Share the IO_APIC_route_entry with iosapic |
From: |
"Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:49:56 +0800 |
Accept-language: |
zh-CN, en-US |
Acceptlanguage: |
zh-CN, en-US |
Cc: |
|
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:50:58 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<C510CF93.1DEEC%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<F4AE3CDE26E0164D9E990A34F2D4E0DF08A5F0CE10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C510CF93.1DEEC%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
AckgiO9bcpoCwP60QhSSqGPREIpSFQAkJdlgAAYECKAABwJS6wG/ibPAAADWZOQAAHRlMA== |
Thread-topic: |
[PATCH] Share the IO_APIC_route_entry with iosapic |
The IO_APIC_reg_xx structures are not used in IPF side.
Let me double check if we also need to move them.
Thanks,
-- Dexuan
-----Original Message-----
From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 2008年10月7日 15:34
To: Cui, Dexuan; 'xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; Xu, Anthony
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Share the IO_APIC_route_entry with iosapic
On 7/10/08 08:24, "Cui, Dexuan" <dexuan.cui@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Keir,
> The iosapic continues to stay inside arch/ia64/; on the other hand, I think
> the struct 'IO_APIC_route_entry' should be placed to a common place so that
> IPF and x86 can share most of the common codes, like interrupt remapping.
> To make the most use of the current x86 VT-d codes, I personally think
> this movement of the definition of the struct IO_APIC_route_entry is necessary
> here.
> Could you please comment this more?
Okay. Please move all arch-neutral definitions to xen/io_apic.h though --
that will at a minimum be all IO_APIC_reg_xx structures.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|