WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] netfront: rx->offset: 12, size: 4294967295

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] netfront: rx->offset: 12, size: 4294967295
From: Jacek Konieczny <jajcus@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 16:05:22 +0200
Delivery-date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:03:31 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C289C99E.FF11%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20070604124040.GC2158@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C289C99E.FF11%keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 01:52:30PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Can you try changing the definition of copying_receiver in netback/common.h
> to be 'unsigned copying_receiver:1' instead of int:1?

It works! See the attached patch (I have changed the other bitfield
too).

Thank you very much.

Greets,
        Jacek

Attachment: xen-netback.patch
Description: Text document

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel