|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?
On 9 Jun 2006, at 15:16, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
The same code is in arch/x86_64/kernel/e820-xen.c and
include/asm-i386/mach-xen/setup_arch_post.h
The x86_64 code has diverged more from native than i386 in this area,
it
would nice to reign it back in.
What is best to send patches against? xen-unstable? Or better
linux-tip?
If you're looking to unify with your previous e820-faking patch: you
can't. One is created before max_pfn is known (and is used by default
to work out what max_pfn should be). The one you added depends on
knowing max_pfn.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Chris Wright
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Chris Wright
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Chris Wright
|
|
|
|
|