|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?
> Oh, I see it's moved to a new function. I guess that's okay, although
> couldn't you fake up an e820 map and call legacy_init_iomem_resource on
> the domU path, rather than having to pull code out into a new function?
Should work equally well, yes.
> Does this patch change behaviour for dom0 at all? I think /proc/iomem
> already looks like native there?
The kernel code and kernel data regions are initialized and registered now.
> Also the patch will need to include
> x86/64 too.
I'll have a look.
cheers,
Gerd
--
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxx>
http://www.suse.de/~kraxel/julika-dora.jpeg
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?,
Gerd Hoffmann <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Chris Wright
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Gerd Hoffmann
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Chris Wright
- Re: [Xen-devel] access shared_info?, Chris Wright
|
|
|
|
|