|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance.
Rumor has it that on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 08:01:52PM +0200 Jens Axboe said:
> On Thu, Mar 31 2005, Philip R Auld wrote:
> >
> > My experience showed very little if any multipage
> > IO coming out of the front end.
>
> There aren't that many users of multipage ios yet. direct io will use
> it, ext2 will as well. iirc, -mm has patches for ext3 too. so it's
> definitely improving :-)
Sorry, I was being sloppy with terminology :)
What I was getting at was that the backend will split requests
up and issue each physical segment as a separate bio (at least in
the 2.0.5 tree I have in front of me). And that none of these
physical segments was more that 1 page.
So the request merging in the back end OS is important, no?
Cheers,
Phil
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
--
Philip R. Auld, Ph.D. Egenera, Inc.
Software Architect 165 Forest St.
(508) 858-2628 Marlboro, MA 01752
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Andrew Theurer
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Philip R Auld
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Philip R Auld
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance.,
Philip R Auld <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
RE: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Ian Pratt
Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Andrew Theurer
|
|
|
|
|