|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance.
On Thu, Mar 31 2005, Philip R Auld wrote:
> > > This effects merging though, right? I don't think the the front
> > > end has done any merging.
> >
> > The noop elevator does front and back merging.
> > My understanding is that it's used in the frontend driver.
>
> If that is the case, it can only merge things that are
> machine contiguous. Current guests know this mapping, but
> can they get this when running unmodified with VT-x.
>
> My experience showed very little if any multipage
> IO coming out of the front end.
There aren't that many users of multipage ios yet. direct io will use
it, ext2 will as well. iirc, -mm has patches for ext3 too. so it's
definitely improving :-)
--
Jens Axboe
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Andrew Theurer
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Philip R Auld
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Philip R Auld
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance.,
Jens Axboe <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Philip R Auld
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
- Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Jens Axboe
RE: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Ian Pratt
Re: [Xen-devel] poor domU VBD performance., Andrew Theurer
|
|
|
|
|