|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Interrupt forwarding
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:01:42 +0000, Keir Fraser
<Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 12 Mar 2005, at 20:07, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
> > [jonsmirl@jonsmirl proc]$ cat interrupts
> > CPU0 CPU1
> > 0: 484259 448188 IO-APIC-edge timer
> > 8: 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
> > 9: 0 0 IO-APIC-level acpi
> > 14: 776 762 IO-APIC-edge ide0
> > 15: 8040 7726 IO-APIC-edge ide1
> > 169: 37509 0 IO-APIC-level libata, uhci_hcd:usb4, eth0
> > 185: 5 0 IO-APIC-level ehci_hcd:usb1
> > 193: 548 272 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd:usb2,
> > uhci_hcd:usb5
> > 201: 0 0 IO-APIC-level uhci_hcd:usb3
> > 209: 3 0 IO-APIC-level ohci1394
> > NMI: 0 0
> > LOC: 932357 932306
> > ERR: 0
> > MIS: 0
>
> Bizarre. Not only routed through an I/O APIC, but the IRQ numbers are
> large enough to probably be MSI vectors. Perhaps the mobo layout has
> legacy PCI slots sharing IRQ lines before reaching MSI logic in the
> chipset? Putting network on the same line as anything else is very
> sucky. Is this really a server-class board?
It is a Dell Poweredge 400SC server. I don't like how the net and
SATA drives are on the same IRQ.
I am running the latest linus bk kernel. The IRQ numbering system in
the kernel has been changed. The board is just a standard APIC without
MSI. No PCI Express.
Xen is planned for desktops too, right? Interrupts are shared all of
the time on desktop systems. It is not safe to assume you can get an
exclusive one.
>
> -- Keir
>
>
--
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|