Re: [Xen-cim] Test suite

[Gareth S Bestor <bestor@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>> pywbem supports embedded instances.  E.g.

Cool! [guess I'm just a CIM-XML dinosaur/old dog... :-)]

- G


xen-cim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 05/17/2007 04:34:42 PM:

> Gareth S Bestor wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for the delay in responding (another 2 week business trip... sigh)
> >
> > I agree. Seems like sblim-testsuite has some basic advantages, even in
> > its current limited form.
> > And whatever dependence it has on a cli helper, ie wbemcli, should be
> > minimally invasive and not
> > too bad to remove/replace with say a python/curl equivalent.
> >
>
> FYI, I committed Luke's patch today.
>
> Luke - you correctly mentioned on today's call that 'interface tests' on
> association providers should be next.  A patch for that would be nice
> :-).  We'll then move on to the 'consistence tests'.
>
> BTW, we might want to just include the input files in project instead of
> generating.  I can see them diverging over time.  What do you think?
>
> > The nice thing about having a lower-level CIM client, at least right
> > now, is that it'll allow us to
> > actually DO DefineVS(), since non of the existing tools support
> > embedded instances (or even
> > references as arguments it seems....)
> >
>
> pywbem supports embedded instances.  E.g.
>
> mem_rasd = pywbem.CIMInstance('Xen_MemorySettingData',
>                                              
> {'ResourceType':pywbem.Uint16(4),
>                                              
> 'VirtualQuantity':pywbem.Uint64(256),
>                                              
> 'AllocationUnits':'MegaBytes'})
>
>
> I regularly use test scripts that do DefineSystem(), AddResource(), etc.
> with such embedded instances :-).
>
> Jim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-cim mailing list
> Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim

_______________________________________________
Xen-cim mailing list
Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim