RE: [Xen-cim] Test suite

["Szymanski, Lukasz K" <Lukasz.Szymanski@xxxxxxxxxx>]

CIMOM independence is definitely something we need to have, so unless
your friend down the hall has a workaround, I think we have to go with
sblim-test.  

Luke 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Fehlig [mailto:jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:40 PM
To: Szymanski, Lukasz K
Cc: xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-cim] Test suite

Szymanski, Lukasz K wrote:
>
> This patch is the humble beginnings of our test suite.  The tests did 
> not get too far with the latest because of all the instability (CIMOM 
> seg faults), however, this is one of the reasons we started down this 
> path anyway.  There are a bunch of errors if cimtester is run on a 
> previous, more stable version, but the test finishes.  Let's decide 
> soon which direction we want to pursue (sblim-test or cimtester) so I 
> can either make improvements on the cimtester stuff or get started on 
> the sblim-test work.
>

Damn...  While playing with your patch I realized (while building it)
that cimtester has a dependency on  OW client library - which is only
available in the whole of OW itself.  So you have to have OW installed
to build/run cimtester :-(.

sblim-testsuite has a dependency on sblim-wbemcli, but the latter has no
cimom dependencies.

Seems to me we want a cimom-independent test infrastructure.  Thoughts?

Jim


_______________________________________________
Xen-cim mailing list
Xen-cim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-cim