| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-api
RE: [Xen-API] RE: Questions about the api
> Actually, if Nexenta exposes the underlying ZFS snapshot and clone
> primitives, then you're probably better off just accessing the raw files
> directly over NFS and then using the ZFS snap API for vdi_snapshot and
> vdi_clone. Is there any performance benefit to using iSCSI instead of
> NFS for the data path layer with Nexenta?
It would be interesting to compare the performance of iSCSI vs NFS. In earlier
versions of Solaris that supported ZFS the iSCSI target wasn't particularly
performant, so NFS was better than iSCSI, but I imagine they are quite similar
now.
The main benefits of using iSCSI over NFS are:
* Easier to do multi-homing
* metadata (and optionally data) protection with CRCs
* ability to "fence" other initiators from having access to an image.
That last point is actually a big deal in cloud environments that need HA.
Ian
_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
|
|
|
| |
|
Home