[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 30/39] xen/riscv: implement APLIC-IMSIC-hart sync barrier for vCPU migration
- To: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Baptiste Le Duc <baptiste.le-duc@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 16:32:03 +0100
- Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=selector1 header.d=vates.tech header.i="@vates.tech" header.h="From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:References:Feedback-ID"
- Cc: Baptiste Le Duc <baptiste.le-duc@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Romain Caritey <Romain.Caritey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zheng Zhang <zhangzheng@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>, Connor Davis <connojdavis@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 05 Nov 2026 15:32:21 +0000
- Feedback-id: default:8631fc262581453bbf619ec5b2062170:Sweego
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 2026-11-05 15:21 +0100, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> [ ... 348 lines skipped ... ]
> > LGTM, but I wonder why, as I said in the original patch, sync_id is
> > really needed.
> >
>
> I think that I am not understand your response. Could you please
> re-phrase it?
I'm questionning the need of the sync_id field as it will always be
equal to imsic_cfg.nr_ids, couldn't we drop it?
--
Baptiste Le Duc <baptiste.le-duc@xxxxxxxxxx>
|
