Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] Add a QTB container to run the Xen riscv64 tests

[Baptiste Le Duc <baptiste.le-duc@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2026-10-28 11:29 +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> [ ... 17 lines skipped ... ]
> > Having it as automation/build/debian/13-qtb-riscv64.dockerfile in
> > xen.git would keep the container next to its only user, avoid the new
> > ARTIFACTS_REGISTRY variable and the image: override in patch 6, and
> > drop the "must land first" ordering between two repositories.
> 
> Indeed, the new container would fit better in the `xen.git` tree.
> 
> And can you rename the container? I think the format is
> "$distrib/$release-$arch-$comments"
I'd rather keep riscv64 as the $arch part. The existing
debian/12-riscv64.dockerfile and debian/13-riscv64.dockerfile are also
built with --platform=linux/amd64, yet they are named after the arch they
target, not the one they run on. Naming this one x86_64 would break that
convention.

Following "$distrib/$release-$arch-$comments", how about
debian/13-riscv64-qtb.dockerfile (and the debian:13-riscv64-qtb image)?

-- 
Baptiste Le Duc <baptiste.le-duc@xxxxxxxxxx>