|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v9 4/5] x86/cpuid: fix unbootable VMs by really inlining memcmp() in hypervisor_cpuid_base()
On Sat, Aug 22, 2026 at 03:33:20PM -0300, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h
> index
> 82eddfa2347b32b76c2ea9b85f005ca5416ac71f..2d9f3d4d63de6e721f275d9e80d372edbdfedf30
> 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h
> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static inline u32 cpuid_base_hypervisor(const char *sig,
> u32 leaves)
> * from PVH early boot code before instrumentation is set up
> * and memcmp() itself may be instrumented.
> */
> - if (!__builtin_memcmp(sig, signature, 12) &&
> + if (!__inline_memcmp(sig, signature, 12) &&
Dunno, did you not think of simply doing it by foot and save yourself all
those gymnastics in patches 1-3?
IOW, something like this totally untested thing below:
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h
index 2d9f3d4d63de..a2db83d17940 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/api.h
@@ -192,9 +192,10 @@ static __always_inline bool cpuid_function_is_indexed(u32
function)
#define for_each_possible_cpuid_base_hypervisor(function) \
for (function = 0x40000000; function < 0x40010000; function += 0x100)
-static inline u32 cpuid_base_hypervisor(const char *sig, u32 leaves)
+static inline u32 cpuid_base_hypervisor(const char *__sig, u32 leaves)
{
u32 base, eax, signature[3];
+ u32 *sig = (u32 *)__sig;
for_each_possible_cpuid_base_hypervisor(base) {
cpuid(base, &eax, &signature[0], &signature[1], &signature[2]);
@@ -204,9 +205,12 @@ static inline u32 cpuid_base_hypervisor(const char *sig,
u32 leaves)
* from PVH early boot code before instrumentation is set up
* and memcmp() itself may be instrumented.
*/
- if (!__inline_memcmp(sig, signature, 12) &&
- (leaves == 0 || ((eax - base) >= leaves)))
- return base;
+ if (sig[0] == signature[0] &&
+ sig[1] == signature[1] &&
+ sig[2] == signature[2]) {
+ if (leaves == 0 || ((eax - base) >= leaves))
+ return base;
+ }
}
return 0;
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |