[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 20/24] XSM: fold xsm_{,un}map_domain_pirq() hooks


  • To: "Daniel P. Smith" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 10:02:43 +0200
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:From:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 08:02:53 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 06.08.2026 09:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.08.2026 03:10, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
>> On 7/28/26 9:23 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c
>>> +++ b/xen/xsm/flask/hooks.c
>>> @@ -1022,14 +1022,9 @@ static char *cf_check flask_show_irq_sid
>>>   
>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_PIRQ
>>>   
>>> -static int cf_check flask_map_domain_pirq(struct domain *d)
>>> +static int cf_check flask_map_domain_pirq(struct domain *d, bool access)
>>>   {
>>> -    return current_has_perm(d, SECCLASS_RESOURCE, RESOURCE__ADD);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static int cf_check flask_unmap_domain_pirq(struct domain *d)
>>> -{
>>> -    return current_has_perm(d, SECCLASS_RESOURCE, RESOURCE__REMOVE);
>>> +    return current_has_perm(d, SECCLASS_RESOURCE, 
>>> resource_to_perm(access));
>>>   }
>>>   
>>>   #endif /* CONFIG_HAS_PIRQ */
>>>
>>
>> I am not opposed to collapsing the calls as long as the semantic is not 
>> lost, which I feel the reuse of the xsm_map_domain_pirq does looses it 
>> much less provides an opportunity for confusion. Something like 
>> xsm_domain_pirq(..., access) makes more semantic sense to me, as it 
>> would read, grant domain pirq access T/F.
> 
> In fact I was as well wondering about naming (and a possible name change)
> here. I decided against it because of the other hooks (touched by patch
> 19), which all follow a similar model of their names really more expressing
> the "positive" form than the "negative" one. Further, entirely losing "map"
> from the name also doesn't look quite right, as physdev_{,un}map_pirq() is
> where they're called from. To follow the naming of some of the other hook,
> maybe xsm_domain_pirq_mapping(..., bool map)? Possibly even with "domain"
> dropped from the name, fully fitting xsm_io{mem,port}_mapping()?

And then xsm_irq_mapping() in patch 23 and xsm_pt_irq_binding() in patch 24?

Jan

> Which
> would then further raise the question whether patch 19 should maybe rename
> the parameters of those two hooks to "map" at the same time.
> 
> Jan




 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.