[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] generic/altp2m: address violations of MISRA C Rule 2.1


  • To: Dmytro Prokopchuk1 <dmytro_prokopchuk1@xxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2026 12:50:58 +0200
  • Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=google header.d=suse.com header.i="@suse.com" header.h="Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:Autocrypt:From:Content-Language:References:Cc:To:Subject:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID"
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 10:51:03 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 09.07.2026 12:00, Dmytro Prokopchuk1 wrote:
> On 6/22/26 13:29, Dmytro Prokopchuk wrote:
>> On 4/10/26 09:04, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 09.04.2026 19:37, Dmytro Prokopchuk1 wrote:
>>>> MISRA C Rule 2.1 states: "A project shall not contain unreachable code".
>>>>
>>>> In certain build configurations,
>>>
>>> Can you give an example where ...
>> If CONFIG_VM_EVENT is enabled on ARM.
>>>
>>>> the function 'altp2m_vcpu_idx()' is defined
>>>> as an inline function that contains the 'BUG()' macro. This resulted 
>>>> in a
>>>> violation because the 'BUG()' macro makes the function non-returning.
>>>>
>>>> To ensure compliance with MISRA C Rule 2.1, this patch removes the 
>>>> inline
>>>> function implementation and its BUG()-based unreachable code. It is 
>>>> replaced
>>>> with an unconditional function declaration for 'altp2m_vcpu_idx()'.
>>>
>>> ... a declaration is needed? The sole non-x86 reference I see is from
>> Yes, declaration is needed. The file 'common/monitor.c' contains a usage 
>> of the 'altp2m_vcpu_idx()' and compiler must see it to avoid "error: 
>> implicit declaration of function ‘altp2m_vcpu_idx’".
>>> common/monitor.c, and the sole relevant Kconfig option I can spot is
>>> VM_EVENT. When that's off, the file won't be built at all.
>> But when 'CONFIG_VM_EVENT=y' this file is compiled on ARM.
>>>
>>> Further, BUG() and a few more constructs have a dedicated deviation
>>> already in place. I don't mind a useless function to be shrunk (or, as
>>> per above, perhaps even dropped), but the justification then needs to
>>> be different.
>> Well, with Stefano's comment regarding return type, the commit subject 
>> and message could be rewritten like:
>>
>> generic/altp2m: align and simplify altp2m_vcpu_idx()
>>
>> The return type of 'altp2m_vcpu_idx()' in the generic altp2m.h header is
>> currently 'unsigned int', which is inconsistent with its 'uint16_t'
>> return type on x86 and the 'altp2m_idx' member of the monitor structures.
>>
>> To fix this type inconsistency and simplify the header, this patch
>> replaces the static inline implementation of 
>> 'altp2m_vcpu_idx()' (contained a BUG() stub) with a simple function 
>> declaration returning
>> uint16_t.
>>
>> For architectures using the generic altp2m.h header (such as ARM when
>> CONFIG_VM_EVENT is enabled), common code calls to 'altp2m_vcpu_idx()' in 
>> common/monitor.c are guarded by 'altp2m_active()', which
>> statically returns 'false'. The compiler's DCE will optimize out these 
>> calls, avoiding any linker issues for the missing definition.
> 
> Hello Jan,
> 
> kind reminder. Please, take a look.

I did, back then already. No specific question was asked for me to answer,
so I was expecting a re-submission, allowing to see new description and
code changes together. That'll then make it easier / more natural to
comment on.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.