[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] nestedsvm: Clear GIF when injecting VMEXIT
- To: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Teddy Astie <teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 16:35:57 +0200
- Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=selector1 header.d=vates.tech header.i="@vates.tech" header.h="From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Feedback-ID"
- Autocrypt: addr=teddy.astie@xxxxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDNBGn5sK8BDACuzSrrTjpVf4ay06OYB6yY0J1PqKffihoNMtrQRZjAHxoAPC7LTBVHV/XO Zw5HJc+9R71z1JV+iYg6z3jPziGKzX8Fj3ZXlzJPmpf1PuETH3KdbvtJT4ny+OGntnJntUoR KRPhTirr6yNeBk/637O3CQXjtqFUPZnko8OI/o1yawIBhJJAWicutjkkUgd28Bh6HV9EIumH tCBgn5/1A/fpm9624MMgYLsA8qjC4XsoovQvFCaO8HEhvfzrrTZHjn/nPeB9SigxIxXW8YaT VqMdqul07o72m3eA2mf+LMu9a04FX/d4wbxBLtELm+1jIrbtyaFZEMOLv/haSiS/Lj3btJH/ EoucejoZ5SH49ksmVAmKOLktOaTQ8b2gEvP7iaKiIiszCCtOSRohr+2GvDsDeLvVZnlR3I+S PhHar7TPKjFz0G3DPNolyjXywNqOAMpomSPi8lSwjAFsxOtQbcck/qRGRSNk4DAmH70pA+89 MXfQXZ3qt1Q01B1+sU0I8xsAEQEAAc0kVGVkZHkgQXN0aWUgPHRlZGR5LmFzdGllQHZhdGVz LnRlY2g+wsENBBMBCAA3FiEEGAIew9LzHY3pdrqtZg+p0QLLz9AFAmn5sK8FCQWjmoACGwME CwkIBwUVCAkKCwUWAgMBAAAKCRBmD6nRAsvP0ID6DACGOktArFbLKHNzuyOVCskwfUZPla6Z pd3GZ8r61SrAKePIr2BnpgPkd0hV3bSRkRLIrgjzR2NRCzfp0x0HfuhcYfAYPR46XHTvjaJE v99sT/vGUG1BZguYDOScSEpgSNaNlYum3RKZbMuROxdK8G+YHccJY8PvWSq2K2yiae2KGiAv 1yjnZxug9/PtDfX8vQFUSg2w1ukRDf50wvDohN1zUQfFtofOP2xCRsDZiHAlQ0pF+aUjXQhP eP3IdpfWc8cyRLXF06Rk46YMYCytweGtGdHcqAfrVthl84129ZPN422k/voW0sm14gjYlGcT UwgnYlFRk2FLq0QeKEDcS0aj3o3EVAQCrayoGzi1pnlIKE3PRGUcUzjGVvzQ/po24gOjwba9 Egr/Wmu3MQlx/7A8zT5QBzF/n+RYdLNQ0Eu6YnUwf0Z1uieqNaon+olyIRFiLb/hCZHO6ekN f5vrm2clHUbQAYaPQebknujoKBo6ZLHg0WM1gZS01Gz+aUpKsUfOwM0EafmwsAEMAKiQiZa3 yQMmc/h3sDbfVHPSiBA4IMI/NAB7IotzPHq1GzCpsoVILAhF/INbWjxJ3DbVf+en3/FvdVZg 2S38xtnth0njNdlVKpyxm054phKjbdoFDwaknWolS4hrddTmetSG5/52AjtmPFtlXAk0NmLv fJnW3seXVQbgM7sW/MNXPP5UKDpkGnLhnvej+GU0s3109sJeXT5ImVdphFs9cvyZyBT9t1Pb Rowv58EgV0zE4hbAeVkULAbxFV5b/ExTjjGVHoX7CVhWxvCiTqCUoXZRkUE9C3FnkzEFRkKb Yu6NCfiHfEyB3Xyg9hfdrRgjMRq907zCof+nDtWxGz1MSEuvTj1g9GZ049Bennqzjc/Q+0ov XoK4jm+Py0FiUGUaA6yhexficjH+kCR/xDbVnWrMhSLB4AuTBT9HjfZI6gk3uYLhoT8Pig4/ eVtR2Q1wZIJsFToR6ofGuyECwFcs+PUXN7fmGRSiPXgjAr/zIUBdW0VWCE3OGPNqtRk2E5s6 IQARAQABwsD8BBgBCAAmFiEEGAIew9LzHY3pdrqtZg+p0QLLz9AFAmn5sLAFCQWjmoACGwwA CgkQZg+p0QLLz9DncQwAg76IehTemLIfrB8T9WIBZrI4kUV7G7a4rjiVoUiHYN5QwhnbZnsa JDlt+Ezoqy/510eo2bCSzvW5xXYPgyjcuOPwgQo1Qp764QxyX6rld2f2RcWkDuBHun55ZWXj by8o21ginPRwruBVYY5rVf3DV1iBu4NurUeHtyFk/dS0XTOQi2wVUb17sW/+ybCEokdVacZG zOqP/OmwHrF8ylXlXnhQq6e3r+J+T8fuoGJelm/CJiMwyP6cEWE8sxVqX/iqwjwUYkuOCpE+ lOWSvdNHgoEkWR0RXBPQjnGmLKbfTl/QDXLk6NP2/r9uxm2HL6Ei3QJKSEdrp+XZaVnk/Off O485NOTKwGOxyWb006cTMh53xPkAJFQu4Tvdj+odsHz88jqw5wfPG0BYWx0I/FspYj7N9kZR 8ULR9nX0LvpzJ/kB4NgHIUt8YtIL6ZSfM2dbF7fKzvx1UqFfvozJZwFzfEieJLXa4nlGgR6D x9fhaZEsniw8/bYgC3igkk5YJiOa
- Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jason Andryuk <jason.andryuk@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 11 May 2026 14:36:22 +0000
- Feedback-id: default:8631fc262581453bbf619ec5b2062170:Sweego
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
Le 07/05/2026 à 15:03, Ross Lagerwall a écrit :
On 4/29/26 5:54 PM, Teddy Astie wrote:
Le 23/04/2026 à 18:13, Ross Lagerwall a écrit :
If L1 executes VMRUN with the GIF set and it fails consistency checks,
Xen will inject a VMEXIT and fail the assert checking the GIF is
cleared.
Instead, clear the GIF when injecting a VMEXIT to match what hardware
does.
Fixes: 9a779e4fc161 ("Implement SVM specific part for Nested
Virtualization")
Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall <ross.lagerwall@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/nestedsvm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/nestedsvm.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/
nestedsvm.c
index ef6fa5d23b67..f89b087a1155 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/nestedsvm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/svm/nestedsvm.c
@@ -733,9 +733,9 @@ nsvm_vcpu_vmexit_inject(struct vcpu *v, struct
cpu_user_regs *regs,
struct vmcb_struct *vmcb = v->arch.hvm.svm.vmcb;
if ( vmcb->_vintr.fields.vgif_enable )
- ASSERT(vmcb->_vintr.fields.vgif == 0);
+ vmcb->_vintr.fields.vgif = 0;
else
- ASSERT(svm->ns_gif == 0);
+ nestedsvm_vcpu_clgi(v);
ns_vmcb = nv->nv_vvmcx;
Looks good to me, though I think we are here looking to make a "guest
CLGI" (clear GIF), so the vGIF specific logic should be collapsed into
nestedsvm_vcpu_clgi() instead of having it as the non-vgif-support case.
(as IIUC, vGIF is a hardware accelration for nested GIF handling ?)
Not 100% sure I follow your point here but v2 of this series removes
nestedsvm_vcpu_clgi() entirely. Does that address your concern?
(also making me notice that svm_vmexit_do_{stgi,clgi}() seems to lack
vGIF specific logic)
Isn't that by design? If vGIF is enabled the hardware should handle
STGI/CLGI without a VMEXIT.
I think at some point in the future, we may need a
`nestedsvm_vcpu_{stgi,clgi}()` function, or something in that regard;
e.g for emulating this instruction outside of a SVM intercept path (x86
emulator bits ?). As I think there are cases where the instruction is
not intercepted but still needs to be emulated.
Such function would need to know whether or not we use vGIF.
Ross
Teddy
Attachment:
OpenPGP_0x660FA9D102CBCFD0.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
|