[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] device-tree: Improve hwdom memory allocation for DMA
- To: "Orzel, Michal" <Michal.Orzel@xxxxxxx>
- From: Luca Fancellu <Luca.Fancellu@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:23:49 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 4.158.2.129) smtp.rcpttodomain=amd.com smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=arm.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=WznTD4DkIBu+ED4RhujjRzxuunyYzur6jIy2pbyo3Dw=; b=jFVXVunUttggirkWqrF/dx4zHTGo06eNXTInZk/HNddNIUQMDRHy7x4Z8Yxz2ZnS1aaA+XCRddBl8S3AEvHIwU79gUWp4u/8qTMw6iJqIxshbDcUcCGRjQKl4gtYX8at0cLSJ1rgMuaxJBfvIoDpRbhW5rVqfOveNEvvV7Oeny04eCCoi20RJzqe0KA2bUxVxcQIdqexJVs/t+TqmEKMYcPq0pjWlD9oxdCoJaWylt5pduxLf+HiDfkFDEF2OwbwsY/VQ6PWf7md8YcEXiqVrRvb/lwIdySskjkmOpzL+SpeSgprnJ4aEgBEFcCGld1xAMzRknsaypEHgI0TpUYPUQ==
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=WznTD4DkIBu+ED4RhujjRzxuunyYzur6jIy2pbyo3Dw=; b=km5WEJ5ZU2k5biN0q2RqmNZrYPxwBEkKX3l9ZXdHuG9laBGRQX7X63F1QkBu1dAlArV7OYlk4j1rwc9G6OTV8OwRFJm1fe1E8IebRnpFIKVWgTv7P0h1r1N+BEGmQMAUqXt/KPwzEMcH4QDdVE6IKb5sr5bknmfT71mWY4JMNvv6NkSJLG0J19IVqzo0RfTOMo1c/VVf9TwTnr6s7UsYcYVqHS7BixcBHuv6PEUG0XqqCjBPyGUh8XshxRruBM4q+S9MMf6+wJmgj4uSUqXvyAKFlksHSQ/0PAfJZGaoNiPepll2mh9tvTzV3Bwakn/lPd0zIcCDAdPojieRWfW5sQ==
- Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=GrsERuT1DICDdZN4mLqW67u2PYBzJ6gxeEVnsaYURNphPfsF4s3XNSDNDWMH/0B94dm4r0R0puInTeV82tv0cCcSJixU2p+z5rCVRt2ENwX9PjZYszIH7rVI/cVv4DtfA5YJ0dPouplMJRKv0sEGnUz7IyLlpGebv9ga+LjIGlrWswwS7hhFSqwtQ9B9j4rUbcx4/J2F9Fda/7FCCFnVfoLdS20Ttoe3CaTjsLWpgNxhoxtSwJ+FwOWHIccfFaiJ877T2sgKUnbp39h5lTla3Qkaq6rQTt9uRlGGNu2y2ffNNzbgSo4bsaLUOd8+AtvjvVrWKhLIOowN+FPTS3UqAw==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=wNiKEPFUji8wyoNxJmVF30Vna93Px/QaLhgVXH3gTx9iJy0gUWnQ7gHGpSS8u7zhlPRW5Xtx62jXV9UVchSmPxg5Qi40KANUKm5TX0GAQ/6jtLtmDfdMNbD3Vjpvec2QHsf7ld1lGmu0hGagYYvOPKV4siMg1794p9oG9pp6NBHH81uh3671pUu6qZz+vrL3paAdDZAdznuOKM3ROn/mjydaCaWkbm3A4dMZNKbAknAitXpFVgMZhIwgs9PSHKvERpOufgq4uGeZO4KIF100FCrPBA8Mir/xBqLJwtzuyLg+DOFv4WS8tvgC3tMZ2lezb//8O7g20AFS8XXeH/naMQ==
- Authentication-results: eu.smtp.expurgate.cloud; dkim=pass header.s=selector1 header.d=arm.com header.i="@arm.com" header.h="From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck"; dkim=pass header.s=selector1 header.d=arm.com header.i="@arm.com" header.h="From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck"
- Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 07:25:04 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Nodisclaimer: true
- Thread-index: AQHczkpLp1xSo4q8Z0ODZraWVEzberXoDpSAgAEIrwCAAAubAA==
- Thread-topic: [PATCH] device-tree: Improve hwdom memory allocation for DMA
>>
>> It looks ok to me, the only thing is that if we have many smaller banks <
>> 128 Mb before reaching
>> one that is at least 128 Mb, we won’t allocate them and loose them forever.
>>
>> It feels only a corner case so for me it’s ok
> Yes, that's something documented in the commit msg, so if we ever face upon
> the
> issue due to that we could revisit the implementation. For now, we haven't
> observed any issues.
>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Luca Fancellu <luca.fancellu@xxxxxxx
>> <mailto:luca.fancellu@xxxxxxx>>
> Thanks.
I realised my mail client messed up the tag:
Reviewed-by: Luca Fancellu <luca.fancellu@xxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Luca
|
