[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 01/27] xen/riscv: Implement ARCH_PAGING_MEMPOOL


  • To: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 09:18:58 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Romain Caritey <Romain.Caritey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>, Connor Davis <connojdavis@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:19:11 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 10.03.2026 18:08, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> The p2m_freelist is used to allocate pages for the P2M, but to initialize
> this list, domain_p2m_set_allocation() might be called.
> This function is invoked in construct_domU() within the common Dom0less
> code, and providing an implementation of domain_p2m_set_allocation() when
> CONFIG_ARCH_PAGING_MEMPOOL=y is appropriate for RISC-V.

With this wording it is odd to see ...

> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>  config RISCV
>       def_bool y
> +     select ARCH_PAGING_MEMPOOL

... this. You really want to settle on whether it is selected unconditionally
or not. Also for the code below, where ...

> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/Makefile
> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/Makefile
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ obj-y += irq.o
>  obj-y += kernel.o
>  obj-y += mm.o
>  obj-y += p2m.o
> -obj-y += paging.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_PAGING_MEMPOOL) += paging.o
>  obj-y += pt.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_64) += riscv64/
>  obj-y += sbi.o

... this change and any #ifdef-ary further down aren't needed unless the
select became conditional. (Plus with the change above things likely wouldn't
even build if ARCH_PAGING_MEMPOOL could be off under certain conditions.)

> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/p2m.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/p2m.c
> @@ -1568,3 +1568,34 @@ struct page_info *get_page_from_gfn(struct domain *d, 
> unsigned long gfn,
>  
>      return page;
>  }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_PAGING_MEMPOOL
> +
> +int arch_set_paging_mempool_size(struct domain *d, uint64_t size)
> +{
> +    unsigned long pages = PFN_DOWN(size);
> +    bool preempted = false;
> +    int rc;
> +
> +    if ( (size & ~PAGE_MASK) || /* Non page-sized request? */
> +         pages != PFN_DOWN(size) ) /* 32-bit overflow? */
> +        return -EINVAL;

Can't this be had with just

    if ( ((paddr_t)pages << PAGE_SHIFT) != size )
        return -EINVAL;

(and perhaps utilizing pfn_to_paddr(), even if it's not a PFN we're dealing
with here)?

> +    spin_lock(&d->arch.paging.lock);
> +    rc = p2m_set_allocation(d, pages, &preempted);
> +    spin_unlock(&d->arch.paging.lock);
> +
> +    ASSERT(preempted == (rc == -ERESTART));

This actually suggests that (once again) Arm code perhaps shouldn't have been
copied verbatim: There shouldn't be a need for the "preempted" state to be
returned back in two distinct ways.

> +    return rc;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return the size of the pool, in bytes. */
> +int arch_get_paging_mempool_size(struct domain *d, uint64_t *size)
> +{
> +    *size = (uint64_t)ACCESS_ONCE(d->arch.paging.total_pages) << PAGE_SHIFT;

As per above, maybe use pfn_to_paddr()?

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.