[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v7 01/14] xen/riscv: detect and store supported hypervisor CSR bits at boot


  • To: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 17:14:37 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: Romain Caritey <Romain.Caritey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>, Connor Davis <connojdavis@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 16:14:49 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 10.03.2026 17:00, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
> On 3/10/26 9:11 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 06.03.2026 17:33, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
>>> --- a/xen/arch/riscv/domain.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/riscv/domain.c
>>> @@ -2,9 +2,66 @@
>>>   
>>>   #include <xen/init.h>
>>>   #include <xen/mm.h>
>>> +#include <xen/sections.h>
>>>   #include <xen/sched.h>
>>>   #include <xen/vmap.h>
>>>   
>>> +#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>>> +#include <asm/csr.h>
>>> +
>>> +struct csr_masks {
>>> +    register_t hedeleg;
>>> +    register_t henvcfg;
>>> +    register_t hideleg;
>>> +    register_t hstateen0;
>>> +
>>> +    struct {
>>> +        register_t hstateen0;
>>> +    } ro_one;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct csr_masks __ro_after_init csr_masks;
>>> +
>>> +#define HEDELEG_AVAIL_MASK ULONG_MAX
>>> +#define HIDELEG_AVAIL_MASK ULONG_MAX
>>> +#define HENVCFG_AVAIL_MASK _UL(0xE0000003000000FF)
>>> +#define HSTATEEN0_AVAIL_MASK _UL(0xDE00000000000007)
>> It's not quite clear to me what AVAIL in here is to signal.
> 
> It signal that these bits are potentially available for s/w to be set.
> If you want to suggest the better naming and can change that in the
> follow-up patch.

I'd either omit the infix altogether ("avail" after all often means
"available for software use"), or use "valid" or (less desirable)
"defined".

>>   It's also not
>> quite clear to me why you would use _UL() in #define-s sitting in a C file
>> (and hence not possibly being used in assembly code; even for asm() I'd
>> expect constants to be properly passed in as C operands).
> 
> I thought it is always be good to use _UL() for such type of constants as
> ULONG_MAX also uses UL, but not in form of _UL() macros. If it would be
> better to drop, I can do that in follow-up patch.

The suffixes want to be there, at the very least for Misra's sake. But
you can just write 0xabcdUL, there's no need to involve a macro there.
That's only needed when the appending of the suffix needs to be
conditional upon is being C or assembler code that includes a header.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.