[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/efi: Add BGRT image preservation during boot


  • To: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 08:31:01 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=jbeulich@xxxxxxxx; keydata= xsDiBFk3nEQRBADAEaSw6zC/EJkiwGPXbWtPxl2xCdSoeepS07jW8UgcHNurfHvUzogEq5xk hu507c3BarVjyWCJOylMNR98Yd8VqD9UfmX0Hb8/BrA+Hl6/DB/eqGptrf4BSRwcZQM32aZK 7Pj2XbGWIUrZrd70x1eAP9QE3P79Y2oLrsCgbZJfEwCgvz9JjGmQqQkRiTVzlZVCJYcyGGsD /0tbFCzD2h20ahe8rC1gbb3K3qk+LpBtvjBu1RY9drYk0NymiGbJWZgab6t1jM7sk2vuf0Py O9Hf9XBmK0uE9IgMaiCpc32XV9oASz6UJebwkX+zF2jG5I1BfnO9g7KlotcA/v5ClMjgo6Gl MDY4HxoSRu3i1cqqSDtVlt+AOVBJBACrZcnHAUSuCXBPy0jOlBhxPqRWv6ND4c9PH1xjQ3NP nxJuMBS8rnNg22uyfAgmBKNLpLgAGVRMZGaGoJObGf72s6TeIqKJo/LtggAS9qAUiuKVnygo 3wjfkS9A3DRO+SpU7JqWdsveeIQyeyEJ/8PTowmSQLakF+3fote9ybzd880fSmFuIEJldWxp Y2ggPGpiZXVsaWNoQHN1c2UuY29tPsJgBBMRAgAgBQJZN5xEAhsDBgsJCAcDAgQVAggDBBYC AwECHgECF4AACgkQoDSui/t3IH4J+wCfQ5jHdEjCRHj23O/5ttg9r9OIruwAn3103WUITZee e7Sbg12UgcQ5lv7SzsFNBFk3nEQQCACCuTjCjFOUdi5Nm244F+78kLghRcin/awv+IrTcIWF hUpSs1Y91iQQ7KItirz5uwCPlwejSJDQJLIS+QtJHaXDXeV6NI0Uef1hP20+y8qydDiVkv6l IreXjTb7DvksRgJNvCkWtYnlS3mYvQ9NzS9PhyALWbXnH6sIJd2O9lKS1Mrfq+y0IXCP10eS FFGg+Av3IQeFatkJAyju0PPthyTqxSI4lZYuJVPknzgaeuJv/2NccrPvmeDg6Coe7ZIeQ8Yj t0ARxu2xytAkkLCel1Lz1WLmwLstV30g80nkgZf/wr+/BXJW/oIvRlonUkxv+IbBM3dX2OV8 AmRv1ySWPTP7AAMFB/9PQK/VtlNUJvg8GXj9ootzrteGfVZVVT4XBJkfwBcpC/XcPzldjv+3 HYudvpdNK3lLujXeA5fLOH+Z/G9WBc5pFVSMocI71I8bT8lIAzreg0WvkWg5V2WZsUMlnDL9 mpwIGFhlbM3gfDMs7MPMu8YQRFVdUvtSpaAs8OFfGQ0ia3LGZcjA6Ik2+xcqscEJzNH+qh8V m5jjp28yZgaqTaRbg3M/+MTbMpicpZuqF4rnB0AQD12/3BNWDR6bmh+EkYSMcEIpQmBM51qM EKYTQGybRCjpnKHGOxG0rfFY1085mBDZCH5Kx0cl0HVJuQKC+dV2ZY5AqjcKwAxpE75MLFkr wkkEGBECAAkFAlk3nEQCGwwACgkQoDSui/t3IH7nnwCfcJWUDUFKdCsBH/E5d+0ZnMQi+G0A nAuWpQkjM1ASeQwSHEeAWPgskBQL
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, sarkarsoumyajyoti23@xxxxxxxxx, "Daniel P . Smith" <dpsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Soumyajyotii Ssarkar <soumyajyotisarkar23@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 09 Mar 2026 07:31:12 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 08.03.2026 19:30, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 12:48:08AM +0530, Soumyajyotii Ssarkar wrote:
>> --- a/xen/common/efi/boot.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/efi/boot.c
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>>  #include <xen/ctype.h>
>>  #include <xen/dmi.h>
>>  #include <xen/domain_page.h>
>> +#include <xen/errno.h>
>>  #include <xen/init.h>
>>  #include <xen/keyhandler.h>
>>  #include <xen/lib.h>
>> @@ -173,6 +174,14 @@ static struct file __initdata ramdisk;
>>  static struct file __initdata xsm;
>>  static const CHAR16 __initconst newline[] = L"\r\n";
>>
>> +static __initdata struct {
>> +    bool preserved;
>> +    uint64_t old_addr;
>> +    uint64_t new_addr;
>> +    uint32_t size;
>> +    const char *failure_reason;
>> +} bgrt_debug_info;
>> +
>>  static void __init PrintStr(const CHAR16 *s)
>>  {
>>      StdOut->OutputString(StdOut, (CHAR16 *)s );
>> @@ -747,6 +756,171 @@ static void __init efi_relocate_esrt(EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE 
>> *SystemTable)
>>      efi_bs->FreePool(memory_map);
>>  }
>>
>> +struct bmp_header {
>> +    uint16_t signature;
>> +    uint32_t file_size;
>> +    uint16_t reserved_1;
>> +    uint16_t reserved_2;
>> +    uint32_t data_offset;
>> +} __attribute__((packed));
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * ACPI Structures - defined locally,
>> + * since we cannot include acpi headers
>> + * in EFI Context.
>> + */
>> +
>> +struct acpi_rsdp {
>> +    char signature[8];
>> +    uint8_t checksum;
>> +    char oem_id[6];
>> +    uint8_t revision;
>> +    uint32_t rsdt_physical_address;
>> +    uint32_t length;
>> +    uint64_t xsdt_physical_address;
>> +    uint8_t extended_checksum;
>> +    uint8_t reserved[3];
>> +} __attribute__((packed));
>> +
>> +struct acpi_table_header {
>> +    char signature[4];
>> +    uint32_t length;
>> +    uint8_t revision;
>> +    uint8_t checksum;
>> +    char oem_id[6];
>> +    char oem_table_id[8];
>> +    uint32_t oem_revision;
>> +    uint32_t asl_compiler_id;
>> +    uint32_t asl_compiler_revision;
>> +} __attribute__((packed));
>> +
>> +struct acpi_xsdt {
>> +    struct acpi_table_header header;
>> +    uint64_t table_offset_entry[1]; /* Variable array length */
> 
> uint64_t table_offset_entry[];
> 
> BTW, do we have some canonical place with list of files imported (and
> kept in sync) with other projects? xen/include/acpi/actbl.h doesn't
> exactly follow Xen coding style, but it's unclear to me if it needs to
> stay this way.

I don't really understand why the headers we've got can't be used. Even
some of the library-like code under xen/acpi/ may be usable here.

While we don't exactly keep xen/include/acpi/ in sync with Linux, when
things are added we preferably add them in the way Linux has them.

>> +} __attribute__((packed));
>> +
>> +struct acpi_bgrt {
>> +    struct acpi_table_header header;
>> +    uint16_t version;
>> +    uint8_t status;
>> +    uint8_t image_type;
>> +    uint64_t image_address;
>> +    uint32_t image_offset_x;
>> +    uint32_t image_offset_y;
>> +} __attribute__((packed));
>> +
>> +static struct acpi_bgrt* __init find_bgrt_table(EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE 
>> *SystemTable)

Nit (style): The first * is misplaced.

>> +{
>> +    EFI_GUID acpi2_guid = ACPI_20_TABLE_GUID;
>> +    struct acpi_rsdp *rsdp = NULL;
>> +    struct acpi_xsdt *xsdt;
>> +    struct acpi_bgrt *bgrt;

Here and ...

>> +    uint32_t entry_count, actual_size;
>> +    unsigned int i;
>> +
>> +    for ( i = 0; i < SystemTable->NumberOfTableEntries; i++ )
>> +    {
>> +        if ( match_guid(&acpi2_guid, 
>> &SystemTable->ConfigurationTable[i].VendorGuid) )
>> +        {
>> +            rsdp = SystemTable->ConfigurationTable[i].VendorTable;
>> +            break;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if ( !rsdp || !rsdp->xsdt_physical_address )
>> +        return NULL;
>> +
>> +    xsdt = (struct acpi_xsdt *)rsdp->xsdt_physical_address;
>> +    if ( !xsdt )
>> +        return NULL;
>> +
>> +    actual_size = (xsdt->header.length - sizeof(struct acpi_table_header));
>> +    entry_count = (actual_size / sizeof(uint64_t));
>> +
>> +    for ( i = 0; i < entry_count; i++ )
>> +    {
>> +        struct acpi_table_header *header = (struct acpi_table_header 
>> *)xsdt->table_offset_entry[i];

... here and elsewhere - please use pointer-to-const wherever possible.

>> +        if (   header->signature[0] == 'B'
>> +            && header->signature[1] == 'G'
>> +            && header->signature[2] == 'R'
>> +            && header->signature[3] == 'T' )
> 
> strncmp?

Or even memcmp() in this case. Plus there is ACPI_SIG_BGRT.

>> +        {
>> +            bgrt = (struct acpi_bgrt *)header;
> 
> You can just return it here, avoiding the extra variable.
> 
>> +            return bgrt;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +    return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define MAX_IMAGE_SIZE  (16 * 1024 * 1024)    /* Sanity check: reject if 
>> bigger */
>> +
>> +static void __init efi_preserve_bgrt_img(EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *SystemTable)
>> +{
>> +    struct acpi_bgrt *bgrt;
>> +    struct bmp_header *bmp;
>> +    void *old_image, *new_image;
>> +    uint32_t image_size;
>> +    EFI_STATUS status;
>> +    uint8_t checksum;
>> +    unsigned int i;
>> +
>> +    bgrt_debug_info.preserved = false;
>> +    bgrt_debug_info.failure_reason = NULL;
>> +
>> +    bgrt = find_bgrt_table(SystemTable);
>> +    if ( !bgrt )
>> +    {
>> +        bgrt_debug_info.failure_reason = "BGRT table not found in XSDT";
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if ( !bgrt->image_address )
>> +    {
>> +        bgrt_debug_info.failure_reason = "BGRT image_address is NULL";
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    old_image = (void *)bgrt->image_address;
>> +    bmp = (struct bmp_header *)old_image;
>> +
>> +    if ( bmp->signature != 0x4D42 )
>> +    {
>> +        bgrt_debug_info.failure_reason = "Invalid BMP signature";
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    image_size = bmp->file_size;
>> +    if ( !image_size || image_size > MAX_IMAGE_SIZE )
>> +    {
>> +        bgrt_debug_info.failure_reason = "Invalid image size";
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    status = efi_bs->AllocatePool(EfiACPIReclaimMemory, image_size, 
>> &new_image);
>> +    if ( status != EFI_SUCCESS || !new_image )
>> +    {
>> +        bgrt_debug_info.failure_reason = "Memory allocation failed";
>> +        return;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    memcpy(new_image, old_image, image_size);
>> +
>> +    bgrt->image_address = (uint64_t)new_image;
>> +    bgrt->status |= 0x01;
> 
> Why forcing the "displayed" bit here?

And if this is needed, why by way of a literal number rather than a suitable
#define?

>> +    bgrt->header.checksum = 0;
>> +    checksum = 0;
>> +    for ( i = 0; i < bgrt->header.length; i++ )
>> +        checksum += ((uint8_t *)bgrt)[i];
>> +    bgrt->header.checksum = (uint8_t)(0 - checksum);
>> +
>> +    bgrt_debug_info.preserved = true;
>> +    bgrt_debug_info.old_addr = (uint64_t)old_image;
>> +    bgrt_debug_info.new_addr = (uint64_t)new_image;
>> +    bgrt_debug_info.size = image_size;
>> +}
>> +
> 
> This is quite a bit of code, maybe move to a separate file? But I'd like
> to hear what others think.

Whether to put in a separate file is only the 2nd question imo. The first is
whether this much code is needed in the first place.

Jan



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.