|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH v2] x86/domctl: Conditionalise x86 domctl using DCE rather than ifdef
On Wed Feb 11, 2026 at 8:17 AM CET, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 10.02.2026 18:30, Alejandro Vallejo wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_sharing.h
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/mem_sharing.h
>> @@ -9,10 +9,12 @@
>> #ifndef __MEM_SHARING_H__
>> #define __MEM_SHARING_H__
>>
>> -#include <public/domctl.h>
>> -#include <public/memory.h>
>> +struct xen_domctl_mem_sharing_op;
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_MEM_SHARING
>> +#include <xen/sched.h>
>> +
>> +struct xen_mem_sharing_op;
>>
>> #define mem_sharing_enabled(d) ((d)->arch.hvm.mem_sharing.enabled)
>>
>> @@ -92,8 +94,6 @@ int mem_sharing_fork_reset(struct domain *d, bool
>> reset_state,
>> int mem_sharing_notify_enomem(struct domain *d, unsigned long gfn,
>> bool allow_sleep);
>> int mem_sharing_memop(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_mem_sharing_op_t) arg);
>> -int mem_sharing_domctl(struct domain *d,
>> - struct xen_domctl_mem_sharing_op *mec);
>>
>> /*
>> * Scans the p2m and relinquishes any shared pages, destroying
>> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ int mem_sharing_domctl(struct domain *d,
>> int relinquish_shared_pages(struct domain *d);
>>
>> #else
>> +struct domctl;
>
> DYM struct domain? If so (can adjust while committing):
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
I did. Annoyingly I only recompiled on with mem_sharing enabled.
>
> Cc-ing Tamas at least for awareness; I think ./MAINTAINERS should enumerate
> this file in the X86 MEMORY SHARING section.
>
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/p2m.h
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/p2m.h
>> @@ -806,12 +806,10 @@ static inline void p2m_pt_init(struct p2m_domain *p2m)
>> {}
>> void *map_domain_gfn(struct p2m_domain *p2m, gfn_t gfn, mfn_t *mfn,
>> p2m_query_t q, uint32_t *pfec);
>>
>> -#if P2M_AUDIT
>> -extern void audit_p2m(struct domain *d,
>> - uint64_t *orphans,
>> - uint64_t *m2p_bad,
>> - uint64_t *p2m_bad);
>> -#endif /* P2M_AUDIT */
>> +void audit_p2m(struct domain *d,
>> + uint64_t *orphans,
>> + uint64_t *m2p_bad,
>> + uint64_t *p2m_bad);
>
> If already you adjust this beyond dropping the #ifdef, I think we also want to
> make use of line length, to better match e.g. the other prototype in patch
> context above. I'm likely to take the liberty of doing so while committing.
>
> Jan
Thanks, Jan.
Alejandro
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |