[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] x86/shadow: suppress trace_emul_write_val hook when !TRACEBUFFER


  • To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 13:27:25 +0000
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector10001; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=mzmbWFcOR0CUdgqSlkOltoVh8M1pgRE2X0Bloc+Ob/Y=; b=ixc747SylPexmVIkcl5+9gPb5RDS3E54hR1wqtBRDekfyTn6cVDXBFocLsvyW0/QW+LffGxUthNGKRb2wgHxqILRj+2tCyb2Ix9rcctgNE0JZgldEC+toTVSMuX29DdRkmPcZFpRLP6K/v3FhdeQhdhlN/T/6HqwpA0TkLxCTEsLRgF9UhOsZ+z2Fj8c3oPS2BytH+Jc9z2y1nXWfPz930acOfW7F2h/rADqQAUlUEtOXuELie5uYsR4TAoBB7287hctNwUq1JEugXJhilHG3RAAmuI4jS85X63mdZhu7kRM14TxPHrMzABl6Hp+lG4ByOEWfJ2/SGRLkkqBOWmE0A==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector10001; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Y3zz+yb2deUigyXxVsBl0kV7IwFBIvmaFt7ulGiD2XdzXxkWoX5pki6L/uv9hFwvUQm+q/YwBrISpXX3CDeUmjtjAGKrLY/cSnqtfSDKzA9ACbgNG3dmt4jj4tzfJsrxMEhtTO852EPOuinghLnCiWGOg83j63nCHRX79FLAvZM6ri1EX/hUHPyf5sAfnW/7hsV1plnRET6VwI/Z1SeYQo6F7kgw17vMFO0Jl3sKQjT2h36i7dz9Ht75y5gmEzDTvOpgMU4CTxIB3u4+6wnGTPNaWjxNHp8MQg9hb2EUx0c177H1IiCk80FzQdoKuDW9LihzzJA9if67kIyzPvnoWg==
  • Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=citrix.com;
  • Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 13:27:46 +0000
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 27/01/2026 1:20 pm, Jan Beulich wrote:
> The hook is never invoked in that case, and hence needlessly offers an
> extra valid indirect call target. With the hook suppressed, no consumer
> of the three local per-CPU variables exists either, so they're
> suppressed as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/paging.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/paging.h
> @@ -90,10 +90,12 @@ struct shadow_paging_mode {
>      int           (*guess_wrmap           )(struct vcpu *v, 
>                                              unsigned long vaddr, mfn_t gmfn);
>      void          (*pagetable_dying       )(paddr_t gpa);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACEBUFFER
>      void          (*trace_emul_write_val  )(const void *ptr, unsigned long 
> vaddr,
>                                              const void *src, unsigned int 
> bytes);
>  #endif
>  #endif
> +#endif

Can we get some comments on these endifs, and ...

> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/multi.c
> @@ -4130,7 +4142,9 @@ const struct paging_mode sh_paging_mode
>      .shadow.guess_wrmap            = sh_guess_wrmap,
>  #endif
>      .shadow.pagetable_dying        = sh_pagetable_dying,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TRACEBUFFER
>      .shadow.trace_emul_write_val   = trace_emulate_write_val,
> +#endif
>  #endif /* CONFIG_HVM */

... this one too.

Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.