Re: [PATCH] x86/altp2m: altp2m_get_effective_entry() should honor ap2m->default_access

[Petr Beneš <w1benny@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 12:24 PM Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 12.01.2026 12:18, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > On 12/01/2026 11:09 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> You didn't even Cc Tamas, who I think once again will need to ack this.

I _considered_ Ccing Tamas when I saw add_maintainers.pl didn't add
him. I couldn't remember if I added him manually at that time or not.
However, in the end, I just trusted the add_maintainers.pl and didn't
modify it.

> >> However, two formal points: Please use 12-digit hashes, as demanded by
> >> sending-patches.pandoc.

I apologize. This is the first time I'm learning of the existence of
sending-patches.pandoc. Up until now I was following the
"Submitting_Xen_Project_Patches" wiki page where nothing about how
many characters of the hash should be included. I'll keep that in
mind.

> >> That earlier change of yours didn't mean to do more than it did, by its
> >> title and description.

True. Had I known at that time that the fix is needed to be applied in
multiple places, the commit message would look different.

> >> We relatively recently introduced Amends:, which
> >> may be a suitable fit here.

So, what should be my next steps? Should I re-send the patch where I
Cc Tamas, use 12-char hashes and replace Fixes with Amends?

P.