[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] xen/domain: introduce generic functions for domain struct allocation and freeing
- To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii_strashko@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Oleksii Kurochko <oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 10:39:19 +0100
- Cc: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marquis@xxxxxxx>, Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Timothy Pearson <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@xxxxxxx>, Bob Eshleman <bobbyeshleman@xxxxxxxxx>, Connor Davis <connojdavis@xxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Nov 2025 09:39:32 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 11/26/25 9:35 PM, Grygorii Strashko
wrote:
On 26.11.25 16:32, Oleksii Kurochko wrote:
From: Roger Pau Monne
<roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Move x86's free_domain_struct() to common code since it is
shared between
architectures.
Move the x86 version of alloc_domain_struct() to common code as
most of the
logic is architecture-independent. To handle the remaining
architectural
differences, introduce arch_alloc_domain_struct_bits() for
x86-specific
allocation requirements.
No functional change.
Suggested-By: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
[Introduce an arch-specific function instead of using a weak
function]
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Oleksii Kurochko
<oleksii.kurochko@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes in v2:
- CI test results:
https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/olkur/xen/-/pipelines/2180836457
- Introduce an arch-specific function to handle differences
between arch-es
in domain structure allocation requirements, instead of
relying on a weak
function.
- Add Suggested-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>.
- Move free_domain_struct() to common code.
- Update the commit message.
---
xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 17 -----------------
xen/arch/ppc/stubs.c | 10 ----------
xen/arch/riscv/stubs.c | 10 ----------
xen/arch/x86/domain.c | 15 ++-------------
xen/arch/x86/include/asm/pv/domain.h | 3 +++
xen/common/domain.c | 23
+++++++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
[...]
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
index 3a21e035f4..34a02f089e 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c
@@ -463,10 +463,8 @@ void domain_cpu_policy_changed(struct
domain *d)
}
}
-struct domain *alloc_domain_struct(void)
+unsigned int arch_alloc_domain_struct_bits(void)
{
- struct domain *d;
-
/*
* Without CONFIG_BIGMEM, we pack the PDX of the domain
structure into
* a 32-bit field within the page_info structure. Hence
the MEMF_bits()
@@ -492,16 +490,7 @@ struct domain *alloc_domain_struct(void)
- 1;
#endif
- BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*d) > PAGE_SIZE);
- d = alloc_xenheap_pages(0, MEMF_bits(bits));
- if ( d != NULL )
- clear_page(d);
- return d;
-}
-
-void free_domain_struct(struct domain *d)
-{
- free_xenheap_page(d);
+ return bits;
}
struct vcpu *alloc_vcpu_struct(const struct domain *d)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/pv/domain.h
b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/pv/domain.h
index 582d004051..6e65bc22fc 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/pv/domain.h
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/pv/domain.h
@@ -18,6 +18,9 @@ extern int8_t opt_pv32;
# define opt_pv32 false
#endif
+unsigned int arch_alloc_domain_struct_bits(void);
+#define arch_alloc_domin_struct_bits
arch_alloc_domain_struct_bits
Is it intentionally placed in PV header
x86/include/asm/pv/domain.h?
Oh, I missed that it is inside PV header. It should be in asm/domain.h, thanks for noticing that!
~ Oleksii
|