Re: [PATCH v2] xen/ppc: Fix tooling FTBFS due to missing definitions in public header

[Timothy Pearson <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> To: "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andrew Cooper" 
> <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Julien Grall"
> <julien@xxxxxxx>, "Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Anthony 
> PERARD" <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Michal
> Orzel" <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>, "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2025 10:30:39 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xen/ppc: Fix tooling FTBFS due to missing definitions 
> in public header

> On 30.10.2025 16:10, Timothy Pearson wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
>>> To: "Timothy Pearson" <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>>> On 29.10.2025 17:23, Timothy Pearson wrote:
>>>> int64_aligned_t and uint64_aligned_t need to be exposed when the GNU C 
>>>> compiler
>>>> is in use.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> Thanks. However, you've lost my R-b, and the Cc list was again entirely 
>>> empty.
>> 
>> Apologies again.  I had thought for a trivial patch the CC was not required,
>> will keep that in mind in the future.
> 
> Just to clarify: However trivial a patch, it needs to be acked by a 
> maintainer.
> Hence
> they will want Cc-ing (not everyone's subscribed to the list, and not everyone
> may be
> following each and every patch that's flowing in).
> 
> Jan

Fair enough.  I'll come up to speed eventually. ;)